Introduction. Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder with a very poor prognosis, requiring urgent action to prevent early mortality and to control the disease and complications. The EMN12/HOVON-129 study assessed the efficacy of carfilzomib and lenalidomide as part of first-line therapy in pPCL. The trial enrolled patients (pts) aged 18 years and older, with different treatment for those 18-65 and ≥66 years. Here we report the results for pts in the age-group ≥66 years.

Methods. The EMN12/HOVON-129 study is a prospective, non-randomized, phase 2, multicenter study for previously untreated pPCL pts. Inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed pPCL (in this study defined as >2x109/L circulating monoclonal plasma cells and/or plasmacytosis >20% of the differential white cell count) and WHO performance status 0-3. Main exclusion criteria were severe cardiac or pulmonary dysfunction and creatinine clearance <15 ml/min. There were no restrictions based on blood counts.

Pts ≥66 years received induction therapy with eight 28-day cycles of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd; carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2 on days 1,2,8,9,15,16; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21; dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1,2,8,9,15,16,22,23), followed by maintenance with carfilzomib (27 mg/m2 on days 1,2,15,16 for the first twelve cycles; then 56 mg/m2 on days 1,15) and lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21/28 days) until progression.

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results. From October 2015 to August 2021, we enrolled 61 pts with pPCL: 36 aged ≤65 years and 25 aged ≥66 years. Among the 25 pts aged ≥66 years, median age was 71 years (range 66-84); 68% had bone disease; and WHO performance status was 2 in 24% and 3 in 16% of pts. Median plasma cell percentage in bone marrow biopsy was 80% (10-100). Median peripheral blood plasma cell count was 3.8x109/L (range 2.0-52); median platelet count was 142x109/L (range 13-384); and median GFR was 56 ml/min (range 24-95). Most of pts had high-risk disease features, as proved by elevated LDH in 52% and high frequency of poor-risk genetic lesions (del(17p) in 20%, t(4;14) in 4%, t(14;16) in 4%, and gain/amp(1q) in 48%). In addition, 12% of pts had extramedullary plasmacytomas. ISS stage III was present in 68% and Revised ISS stage III in 40%.

At the data cut-off (July 1, 2022), among the 25 pts, 17 (68%) received the planned 8 cycles of induction treatment, achieving ≥partial response (PR) in 80%, ≥very good (VG)PR in 68%, and ≥complete response (CR) in 32% of pts. Sixteen pts (64%) received maintenance treatment. Best response on protocol was ≥PR in 80%, ≥VGPR in 68% and ≥CR in 36%; 3 out of 4 pts in CR who could be evaluated for minimal residual disease (MRD) achieved MRD negativity (10-5) by flow cytometry.

With a median follow-up of 24.6 months (range 7.9-59.6), the median PFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 9.2-35.5), which was sufficient to reject our null hypothesis (median PFS=6.5 months). With 16 pts having died (8 due to disease progression, 2 unknown, 1 pneumonia, 1 sepsis, 1 systemic aspergillus infection, 1 small intestinal SPM, 1 disseminated intravascular coagulation, 1 respiratory failure due to COPD exacerbation), median OS was 24.8 months (95% CI 14-not reached [NR]; Figure).

Adverse events mainly occurred during the first two cycles of KRd and decreased thereafter. Overall, 36% of pts had grade (G)3 and another 36% G4 adverse events. G3 and G4 hematologic toxicity rates were 8% and 12%, respectively. Infections (20% and 16%) and respiratory events (16% and 4%) were the most common G3 and G4 non-hematologic toxicities. Twenty-two pts (88%) discontinued protocol treatment, mainly because of progression (13 pts, 59%).

Conclusions. KRd is a potent treatment strategy to control disease in pPCL pts over 65 years of age, with not negligible, but generally manageable, treatment-related toxicities. Of note, along with a significant improvement of PFS, median OS substantially doubled compared to what has been reported in recent retrospective studies and, particularly, in the only other prospective trial (with the doublet lenalidomide-dexamethasone) so far conducted in transplant ineligible, elderly pts with pPCL (Musto P et al. Leukemia. 2014;28:222-5).

This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl (until June 2022) and https://trialsearch.who.int/ as NTR5350.

Musto:Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Minnema:Medscape: Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Roeloffzen:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Vangsted:Celgene: Honoraria. Broijl:Janssen: Other: Advisory boards/honoraria; Sanofi: Other: Advisory boards/honoraria; Amgen: Other: Advisory boards/honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory boards/honoraria. Schjesvold:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Skylite DX: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Targovax: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Benjamin:Amgen: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Research Funding. Wu:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Caers:Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cavo:Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Roche, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hájek:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant or advisory relationship, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant or advisory relationship, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Consultant or advisory relationship; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: Consultant or advisory relationship, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Consultant or advisory relationship, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Consultant or advisory relationship, Research Funding; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Other: Consultant or advisory relationship; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant or advisory relationship, Research Funding. Offidani:ROCHE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSEEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ABBVIE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb): Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SANOFI: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TAKEDA: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Boccadoro:GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding. van de Donk:Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb): Research Funding.

This presentation includes discussion of the off-label use of a drug or drugs for the treatment of primary plasma cell leukemia: carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone.

Author notes

This icon denotes a clinically relevant abstract

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution